Number
seventeen on the list of the twenty most common grammar errors is the
unnecessary comma with restrictive element.
German
I
have taken a lot of German classes, and I can actually speak a bit of the
language, which is exciting to me. In my last class, my instructor had us write
a lot of essays, and the one item I got marked on a lot was my commas. My
instructor told me that was a common problem among English speakers.
English
writers are comma crazy.
Restrictive Element
In
error number 5, no comma in
non-restrictive element, we learned that a non-restrictive element was really a
parenthetical and should be sent off by commas. Whereas a non-restrictive
element is not necessary to the understanding of the sentence, a restrictive
element or an essential element is vital to the meaning of the sentence.
I
like the examples of restrictive elements on About.com’s grammar portion
of their site, so I am reproducing them here with my own edits.
v A person who
won’t read has no advantage over one who can’t read. –Mark Twain
§ A person has no
advantage over one.
v A poet more than
thirty years old is simply an overgrown child. –H.L. Mencken
§ A poet is simply
an overgrown child.
v It is impossible
to imagine Goethe or Beethoven being good at billiards or golf. –H.L. Mencken
§ It is impossible
to imagine Goethe or Beethoven.
What
happened to the sentences when I removed the restrictive elements?
Notice
also the missing commas. And if you add the commas, the commas drastically
change the meaning of the sentence.
It is impossible
to imagine Goethe or Beethoven, being good at billiards or golf.
Adding
the comma to the above sentence changes the meaning. The sentence now means: if
you are good at billiards or golf, then it is impossible for you to imagine
Goethe or Beethoven.
No comments:
Post a Comment