Browsing the
Goodreads reviews of The Woman Who Owned
the Shadows, many reviewers commented on how difficult the novel was to
read. They complained about the stream of consciousness narrative style or how
ambiguous the ending made them feel, and how they felt empty after reading the
book—that they had no sense of conclusion. Certainly, I don’t think Allen
intended The Woman Who Owned to be
easy, or necessarily fulfilling in the way many modern readers approach genre
books, that is for entertainment. So certainly entertaining, one wonders though
if Ephanie is totally sane, whether her struggles with homosexuality are even
normal, let alone her abandonment of her children, and her abandonment of her
self.
Allen
uses the word “re membering” throughout her work. At first, I thought this word
construction was odd—why would she separate the prefix? But “member” suggests a
part of something greater. The arm, for example, is a member of the physical
body. The arm is both separate from the body and belonging to the body at the
same moment. One is a member of a tribe. One is a member of a nation, or
belongs to a nation. And “re” is from the Latin prefix root meaning “again” or
“again and again.” By separating the prefix from the root word, Allen is able
to not completely remove the idea of memory from the word, and places emphasis
upon Ephanie’s becoming a member of a culture, again and again. The end of the
book, Ephanie falls into a new world, just as Sky Woman is pushed by her
husband through a hole in the ground to the earth.
Allen not only
connects Ephanie to a religious and historical Native America past but to the present
and future that includes the modern world and the European encroachment upon
the land. Neither world is presented in Allen’s novel as ideal. Both the past
and the present are depicted with their own fragilities. Everyone is broken:
Spider Grandmother, who is betrayed; Sky Woman, who is pushed to her death by
her husband and left alone; Elana, who is forced by her parents to stay away
from Ephanie; Stephen and Thomas, who unsuccessfully look toward women for
self-completion; and Teresa, who yearns for a spirituality that she cannot
fully possess.
No
one seems to be able to possess anything in Allen’s novel, actually. It is a
struggle to figure out personal identity in relation to the rest of the world. Ephanie’s
name resembles “epiphany,” and the novel’s epiphany seems to suggest there is
no salvation in life, but that we must still look beyond the practicalities of
life to the spiritual for a fullness that cannot be fulfilled through
companionship, security, or family. We must then re member.
No comments:
Post a Comment